Dade County v. Baker
This text of 356 So. 2d 65 (Dade County v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dade County brings this petition for writ of certiorari to review an order of the respondent judge ordering Dade County to pay to the attorney for one Albert Thomas, a respondent herein, the money that Thomas had expended for a bail bond premium while he was a criminal defendant in the circuit court upon a charge that was ultimately dismissed due to the state’s failure to produce a witness for deposition.
Respondents urge that such payments should be refundable pursuant to Article I, Section 19, of the Florida Constitution, and Sections 939.06 and 939.07, Florida Statutes (1975). This court has previously dealt with this assertion and has held that the premiums for bail bonds are not taxable. See Holton v. State, 311 So.2d 711 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); and see Dinauer v. State, 317 So.2d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); and Daniel v. State, 309 So.2d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).
Upon authority of the cited cases, the order of the respondent judge dated July 20, 1977, ordering the County Comptroller to pay Zebedee W. Wright the sum of $735.00, is quashed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
356 So. 2d 65, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dade-county-v-baker-fladistctapp-1978.