Dade County v. Adler

18 Fla. Supp. 171

This text of 18 Fla. Supp. 171 (Dade County v. Adler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dade County v. Adler, 18 Fla. Supp. 171 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1960).

Opinion

IRVING CYPEN, Circuit Judge.

This cause came on before me, on appeal from a conviction in the Dade County metropolitan court, on a charge of driving under the influence of narcotics.

The court, having heard from counsel for the appellant and the county, finds that one of the witnesses for the county, a police officer, making an investigation as such police officer, was permitted to testify as to what the appellant told him following the accident which resulted in the charge and conviction herein, in answer to questions by the police officer.

This was error as section 317.17, Florida Statutes, provides that no such report shall be used as evidence in any trial, civil or criminal. The appellant has cited a number of cases supporting this principle of law and the law is too well settled to permit dispute on this point. The county contends it was not harmful error but this court thinks otherwise.

It is therefore ordered that the conviction, judgment and sentence of the metropolitan court is reversed and a new trial ordered with all costs taxed against the appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Fla. Supp. 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dade-county-v-adler-flacirct11mia-1960.