DADDARIO, TIMOTHY J. v. BUSINESS VENTURE ASSOCIATES LIMITED, PARTNERSHIP
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
1350 CA 11-01025 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
TIMOTHY J. DADDARIO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
V ORDER
BUSINESS VENTURE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
THORN GERSHON TYMANN AND BONANNI, LLP, ALBANY (AMANDA KURYLUK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, SYRACUSE (AMY M. VANDERLYKE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Brian F. DeJoseph, J.), entered March 11, 2011 in a personal injury action. The order denied the motion of defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: December 23, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DADDARIO, TIMOTHY J. v. BUSINESS VENTURE ASSOCIATES LIMITED, PARTNERSHIP (DADDARIO, TIMOTHY J. v. BUSINESS VENTURE ASSOCIATES LIMITED, PARTNERSHIP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.