DaCosta Daniels v. Joshua Tyler
This text of 614 F. App'x 343 (DaCosta Daniels v. Joshua Tyler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DaCosta Daniels appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action asserting a Fourth Amendment excessive-force claim and a state-law assault claim against a police officer.
After careful de novo review, viewing the evidence and drawing all reasonable inferences in favor of Daniels, see Laganiere v. Cty. of Olmsted, 772 F.3d 1114, 1116 (8th Cir.2014), we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment based on qualified immunity, see Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 396-97, 109 S.Ct. 1865, 104 L.Ed.2d 443 (1989); Crumley v. City of St. Paul, 324 F.3d 1003, 1007 (8th Cir.2003), and statutory immunity, see Iowa Code § 804.8(1); Johnson v. Civil Serv. Comm’n, 352 N.W.2d 252, 257 (Iowa 1984).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
.. The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
614 F. App'x 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dacosta-daniels-v-joshua-tyler-ca8-2015.