Dachton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dachton v. State

287 So. 2d 347

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 4, 1973·No. No. 73-342·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s first point on appeal questions the sufficiency of the evidence upon which the trial court found him guilty of criminal contempt and sentenced him to sixty days in the county jail. Our review of the record convinces us that the evidence, although conflicting, substantially supports the holding of the trial judge. See State v. Sebastian, Fla. 1965, 171 So.2d 893. Appellant’s remaining points appear to be appellate afterthoughts and do not present reversible error upon authority of the rule stated in Silver v. State, Fla. 1966, 188 So.2d 300.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s first point on appeal questions the sufficiency of the evidence upon which the trial court found him guilty of criminal contempt and sentenced him to sixty days in the county jail. Our review of the record convinces us that the evidence, although conflicting, substantially supports the holding of the trial judge. See State v. Sebastian, Fla. 1965, 171 So.2d 893. Appellant’s remaining points appear to be appellate afterthoughts and do not present reversible error upon authority of the rule stated in Silver v. State, Fla. 1966, 188 So.2d 300.

Affirmed.

Dachton v. State, 287 So. 2d 347 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

287 So. 2d 347 (Dachton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related