Dachenhausen v. Crosson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dachenhausen v. Crosson

204 A.D.2d 320, 614 N.Y.S.2d 141

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 2, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 204 A.D.2d 320 (Dachenhausen v. Crosson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dachenhausen v. Crosson, 204 A.D.2d 320, 614 N.Y.S.2d 141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a consolidated proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Chief Administrator of the Courts of the Unified Court System of the State of New York, which combined the titles of Senior Court Clerk (JG-21) and Court Clerk (JG-18) into a single title for the sole purpose of displacement, the appeal, as limited by the appellants’ brief, is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Rossetti, J.), dated May 26, 1992, as annulled the determination and directed that the petitioners be displaced to the title of Senior Court Clerk (JG-21), rather than to the title of Court Clerk (JG-18).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated in the decision and order of Justice Rossetti in the Supreme Court dated March 25, 1992. Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur. [See, 154 Misc 2d 132.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a consolidated proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Chief Administrator of the Courts of the Unified Court System of the State of New York, which combined the titles of Senior Court Clerk (JG-21) and Court Clerk (JG-18) into a single title for the sole purpose of displacement, the appeal, as limited by the appellants’ brief, is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Rossetti, J.), dated May 26, 1992, as annulled the determination and directed that the petitioners be displaced to the title of Senior Court Clerk (JG-21), rather than to the title of Court Clerk (JG-18).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated in the decision and order of Justice Rossetti in the Supreme Court dated March 25, 1992. Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur. [See, 154 Misc 2d 132.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 A.D.2d 320, 614 N.Y.S.2d 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dachenhausen-v-crosson-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack