Dache v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dache v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.

272 A.D.2d 773

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 773 (Dache v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dache v. Abraham & Straus, Inc., 272 A.D.2d 773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for [774]*774libel and violation of the Civil Rights Law, order denying appellants’ cross motion to strike out the defenses set forth in paragraphs XXIII to XXXYI, inclusive, of the second amended answer of respondent, on the ground of insufficiency under rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice, or, in the alternative, on the ground of sham, etc., under rule 103, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Adel, Nolan and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for [774]*774libel and violation of the Civil Rights Law, order denying appellants’ cross motion to strike out the defenses set forth in paragraphs XXIII to XXXYI, inclusive, of the second amended answer of respondent, on the ground of insufficiency under rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice, or, in the alternative, on the ground of sham, etc., under rule 103, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Adel, Nolan and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dache-v-abraham-straus-inc-nyappdiv-1947.