Dacek v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dacek v. State

664 So. 2d 275, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11737, 1995 WL 664584

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 9, 1995

DocketNo. 94-2307

StatusPublished

This text of 664 So. 2d 275 (Dacek v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dacek v. State, 664 So. 2d 275, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11737, 1995 WL 664584 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

WOLF, Judge.

Michael Daeek appeals, challenging certain costs which were imposed after he entered a plea to the offenses of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and driving under the influence of alcohol. The $50 fee imposed for the crime compensation trust fund, as well as the $50 fee for misdemeanor court costs assessed pursuant to the misdemeanor count, were duplicative of fees assessed for the felony conviction. These fees must be stricken pursuant to our decision in Hunter v. State, 651 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). We, therefore, remand to the trial court to perform the ministerial duty of striking these costs. We affirm as to all other costs.

LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOLF, Judge.

Michael Daeek appeals, challenging certain costs which were imposed after he entered a plea to the offenses of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and driving under the influence of alcohol. The $50 fee imposed for the crime compensation trust fund, as well as the $50 fee for misdemeanor court costs assessed pursuant to the misdemeanor count, were duplicative of fees assessed for the felony conviction. These fees must be stricken pursuant to our decision in Hunter v. State, 651 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). We, therefore, remand to the trial court to perform the ministerial duty of striking these costs. We affirm as to all other costs.

LAWRENCE and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

664 So. 2d 275, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11737, 1995 WL 664584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dacek-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack