Dace v. Dace

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dace v. Dace

364 S.W.3d 261, 2012 WL 1242632, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 471

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 10, 2012·No. ED 96569·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daron L. Dace (“Husband”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment dissolving his marriage to Cathy S. Dace (“Wife”). Husband contends that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding Wife maintenance in the amount of $958.00 per month and in awarding her attorney fees in the amount of $6,500.00.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, *262 setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daron L. Dace (“Husband”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment dissolving his marriage to Cathy S. Dace (“Wife”). Husband contends that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding Wife maintenance in the amount of $958.00 per month and in awarding her attorney fees in the amount of $6,500.00.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, *262 setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Dace v. Dace, 364 S.W.3d 261, 2012 WL 1242632, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 471 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

364 S.W.3d 261 (Dace v. Dace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.