Dacanay v. Sakamoto
This text of Dacanay v. Sakamoto (Dacanay v. Sakamoto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-13-0004663 01-MAY-2014 01:25 PM
SCPW-13-0004663
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
FELIX DACANAY AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROGER ROXAS and THE GOLDEN BUDHA CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Petitioners,
vs.
HONORABLE KARL K. SAKAMOTO, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, Respondent Judge,
and
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI#I and IMELDA MARCOS AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF FERDINAND E. MARCOS and IMELDA MARCOS, INDIVIDUALLY, Respondents.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CIV. NO. 88-0522-02)
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PETITION FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioners Felix Dacanay, as
personal representative of the Estate of Roger Roxas, and The
Golden Budha Corporation’s petition for writs of mandamus or
prohibition, filed on October 29, 2013, the documents attached
thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it
appears that petitioners have failed to demonstrate that they do not have alternative means of seeking the requested relief.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writs of
mandamus or prohibition is denied without prejudice.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 1, 2014.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dacanay v. Sakamoto, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dacanay-v-sakamoto-haw-2014.