Dabre v. Filene's Department Store, No. Cv99-0066429s (Jul. 29, 2000)

Connecticut Superior Court

Dabre v. Filene's Department Store, No. Cv99-0066429s (Jul. 29, 2000)

2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 8825

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedJuly 29, 2000

DocketNo. CV99-0066429S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 8825 (Dabre v. Filene's Department Store, No. Cv99-0066429s (Jul. 29, 2000)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dabre v. Filene's Department Store, No. Cv99-0066429s (Jul. 29, 2000), 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 8825 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON AMENDED MOTION TO STRIKE (#141, #142) OF DEFENDANT FILENE'S ONLY AS TO THIRD REVISED COMPLAINT

1. As to paragraph 2 —

Granted: See decision of April 26, 2000 CT Page 8826 (#128). Also Surowiec v. Security Forces, Inc. 1995 W.L. 328362.

2. As to paragraph 8 —

Granted: Facts as pled do not sufficiently indicate the defendant, because of plaintiff's race, prevented the plaintiff from utilizing services of Connecticut Post Mall or any other mall in violation of C.G.S. § 46a-64(A).

3. As to paragraph 9 —

Granted: See decision as to paragraph 8 above. Same as relates to right to contract in violation of U.S.C. § 1981.

4. As to paragraph 10 —

Granted: See decision as to paragraph 8 above. Same as relates to right to purchase personal property in violation of U.S.C. § 1982.

George W. Ripley II Judge Trial Referee

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON AMENDED MOTION TO STRIKE (#141, #142) OF DEFENDANT FILENE'S ONLY AS TO THIRD REVISED COMPLAINT

1. As to paragraph 2 —

Granted: See decision of April 26, 2000 CT Page 8826 (#128). Also Surowiec v. Security Forces, Inc. 1995 W.L. 328362.

2. As to paragraph 8 —

Granted: Facts as pled do not sufficiently indicate the defendant, because of plaintiff's race, prevented the plaintiff from utilizing services of Connecticut Post Mall or any other mall in violation of C.G.S. § 46a-64(A).

3. As to paragraph 9 —

Granted: See decision as to paragraph 8 above. Same as relates to right to contract in violation of U.S.C. § 1981.

4. As to paragraph 10 —

Granted: See decision as to paragraph 8 above. Same as relates to right to purchase personal property in violation of U.S.C. § 1982.

George W. Ripley II Judge Trial Referee

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 8825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dabre-v-filenes-department-store-no-cv99-0066429s-jul-29-2000-connsuperct-2000.

Opinion

2. As to paragraph 8 —

3. As to paragraph 9 —

4. As to paragraph 10 —

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack