Dabovich v. Emeric

California Supreme Court

Dabovich v. Emeric

1 Cal. Unrep. 90

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 3, 1860

DocketNo. 2627

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cal. Unrep. 90 (Dabovich v. Emeric) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dabovich v. Emeric, 1 Cal. Unrep. 90 (Cal. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

BALDWIN, J.

This case has been tried three times and verdicts had for plaintiff. It seems to have been tried the last time in accordance with the principles of the decision here when the case was last in this court. We see no such error as to induce us to interfere with the judgment.

The point as to the costs is not well tafeen. The motion to retax should have been made below within the time prescribed.

The judgment is affirmed.

I concur: Cope, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BALDWIN, J.

This case has been tried three times and verdicts had for plaintiff. It seems to have been tried the last time in accordance with the principles of the decision here when the case was last in this court. We see no such error as to induce us to interfere with the judgment.

The point as to the costs is not well tafeen. The motion to retax should have been made below within the time prescribed.

The judgment is affirmed.

I concur: Cope, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cal. Unrep. 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dabovich-v-emeric-cal-1860.