Dabo v. One Hudson Yards Owner, LLC
This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 7751 (Dabo v. One Hudson Yards Owner, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| Dabo v One Hudson Yards Owner, LLC |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 07751 |
| Decided on October 29, 2019 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on October 29, 2019
Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Mazzarelli, Webber, Oing, JJ.
10240N 150334/17
v
One Hudson Yards Owner, LLC, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Cornell Grace, P.C., New York (Porsha Johnson of counsel), for appellants.
Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C., New York (Brian J. Shoot of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul A. Goetz, J.), entered on or about October 12, 2018, which denied defendants' motion for a protective order to prevent disclosure of their insurer's accident investigation report, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted.
Documents in an insurer's claim file, including an accident investigation report, that were prepared for litigation against its insured are immune from disclosure (see CPLR 3101[d][2]; Recant v Harwood, 222 AD2d 372, 373-374 [1st Dept 1995]). Although documents in a first-party insurance action prepared in an insurer's ordinary course of business in investigating whether to accept or reject coverage are discoverable (see CPLR 3101[g]; Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v American Home Assur. Co., 23 AD3d 190, 191 [2005]), there is no indication that such documents are being protected here. In the absence of any demonstration of hardship by plaintiff, the insurer's accident investigation report remains privileged (see Veltre v Rainbow Convenience Store, Inc., 146 AD3d 416 [1st Dept 2017]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: OCTOBER 29, 2019
CLERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 NY Slip Op 7751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dabo-v-one-hudson-yards-owner-llc-nyappdiv-2019.