Dabney v. Stidger

12 Miss. 749
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1840
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 Miss. 749 (Dabney v. Stidger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dabney v. Stidger, 12 Miss. 749 (Mich. 1840).

Opinion

Mr Justice Turner

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appeal from the circuit court of Hinds county.

The only question raised in this case is whether the executor or administrator of a deceased partner is entitled to notice of the non-payment of a note indorsed by the partners as such.

The authorities are clear, and are believed to be uniform, that notice to one is notice to all. Bayley on Bills, 285; 1 Con. R. 368; 4 Cow. 126; 6 Louisiana, 684; 3 Litt, 251. But it must appear that they are partners. In this case it so appears. Persons being joint payees of a note, who severally indorse it, are entitled each to notice of non-payment. They being joint, does not necessarily constitute them partners. The act of assembly relied on by the appellant, found in Statute Laws of Mississippi, H. & H. 595, merely affects the remedy and not the right, and was passed to facilitate creditors in obtaining judgment for their just demands against one or all of several partners.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Case v. McKinnis
213 P. 422 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Miss. 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dabney-v-stidger-miss-1840.