Dabney v. Mediq Life Support Services

516 S.W.3d 370, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 700, 2017 WL 677808
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 21, 2017
DocketNo. ED 104655
StatusPublished

This text of 516 S.W.3d 370 (Dabney v. Mediq Life Support Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dabney v. Mediq Life Support Services, 516 S.W.3d 370, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 700, 2017 WL 677808 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joann Dabney appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s decisions finding she failed to demonstrate she sustained a work-related injury and denying her disability benefits from Mediq Life Support Services and the Second Injury Fund. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the Commission’s judgments are supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence, and are not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220, 222-23 (Mo. banc 2003). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection
121 S.W.3d 220 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
516 S.W.3d 370, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 700, 2017 WL 677808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dabney-v-mediq-life-support-services-moctapp-2017.