Dabbon v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedApril 12, 2021
Docket18-1796
StatusPublished

This text of Dabbon v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Dabbon v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dabbon v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2021).

Opinion

Sn the Cnited States Court of Federal Claiung

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-1796V Filed: March 16, 2021

* oF ok Ck oe ok OF Oe Ok ek OK OK ARMAND DABBON, * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * Decision on Joint Stipulation; * Tetanus-diphtheria-acellular v. * pertussis (“Tdap”) Vaccine; *s Guillain-Barre Syndrome SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“GBS”) AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * oF ok Ck oe ok OF Oe Ok ek OK OK

Leah Durant, Esq., Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Mary Holmes, Esq., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION! Roth, Special Master:

On November 21, 2018, Armand Dabbon (“Mr. Dabbon or “petitioner’) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.” Petitioner alleges that he developed Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”) after receiving a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccination on February 27, 2017. Stipulation, filed Mar. 16, 2021, at J 1-4. Respondent denies that the Tdap vaccine caused petitioner to develop GBS, any other injury, and/or his current condition. Stipulation at {[ 6.

Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On March 16, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms.

Respondent agrees to issue the following payment:

| Although this Decision has been formally designated “unpublished,” it will nevertheless be posted on the Court of Federal Claims’s website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107- 347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. However, the parties may object to the Decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole Decision will be available to the public. /d.

? National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). A lump sum of $105,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Armand Dabbon. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).

I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.?

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth Mindy Michaels Roth Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

ARMAND DABBON,

Petitioner, No. 18-1796V

Special Master Roth

Vv. ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Petitioner filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10 to -34 (the “Vaccine Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt of the tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis ("Tdap") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received the Tdap vaccine on February 27, 2017.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that he suffered from Guillain-Barre Syndrome ("GBS") as a result of receiving the Tdap vaccine. Petitioner alleges that he experienced the residual effects of this condition for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages as a result of his condition. 6. Respondent denies that the Tdap vaccine caused petitioner to develop GBS, any other injury, and/or his current condition.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $105,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This

amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition.

10, Petitioner and his attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. §

1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis. 11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 and any amounts awarded pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i), subject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds.

12. The parties and their attorneys further agree and stipulate that, except for any award for attorneys’ fees and litigation costs, and past unreimbursed expenses, the money provided pursuant to this Stipulation will be used solely for the benefit of petitioner as contemplated by a strict construction of 42 U.S.C. §300aa-15(a) and (d), and subject to the conditions of 42 U.S.C. § 300a

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dabbon v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dabbon-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2021.