Dabbene v. Dabbene
This text of 297 A.D.2d 812 (Dabbene v. Dabbene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record supports the Family Court’s determination that, based on a preponderance of the credible evidence, the former wife committed a family offense, warranting the issuance of the order of protection (see Family Ct Act § 812 [1]; § 832; Matter of Hogan v Hogan, 271 AD2d 533).
Under the facts of this case, the Family Court’s failure to hold a dispositional hearing does not require reversal (see Matter of Annie C. v Marcellus W., 278 AD2d 177; Matter of Quin[813]*813tana v Quintana, 237 AD2d 130; cf. Matter of Alice C. v Joseph C., 212 AD2d 698). Altman, J.P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
297 A.D.2d 812, 747 N.Y.2d 808, 747 N.Y.S.2d 808, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dabbene-v-dabbene-nyappdiv-2002.