Dabash v. State
This text of Dabash v. State (Dabash v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
Uri Dabash, Respondent,
v.
State of South Carolina, Petitioner.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Appeal From Horry County
Michael J. Baxley, Post-Conviction Relief Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2009-MO-015
Submitted March 18, 2009 Filed March 23,
2009
REVERSED
Attorney General Henry D. McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Sally W. Elliot, and Assistant Attorney General Christina J. Catoe, all of the Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Tricia A. Blanchette, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: The State seeks a writ of certiorari to review the order of the circuit court granting respondents application for post-conviction relief (PCR). We grant the States petition, dispense with further briefing, and reverse.
The PCR judge relied on S.C. Code Ann. § 17-27-45(C) (2003) and Coats v. State, 352 S.C. 500, 575 S.E.2d 557 (2003) in finding respondents PCR application was not time-barred. However, we find respondents PCR application was time-barred under § 17-27-45(C).
Because the PCR judge erred in finding respondents PCR application was not time-barred, we reverse the decision of the PCR judge.
REVERSED.
TOAL, C.J., WALLER, PLEICONES, BEATTY and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dabash v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dabash-v-state-sc-2009.