D.A.B. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

D.A.B. v. State

156 So. 3d 582, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1192, 2015 WL 376431

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 30, 2015

DocketNo. 5D14-964

StatusPublished

This text of 156 So. 3d 582 (D.A.B. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

D.A.B. v. State, 156 So. 3d 582, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1192, 2015 WL 376431 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

D.A.B. appeals an order directing payment of restitution.¹ In April of 2018, D.A.B. pleaded no contest to charges of taking a deer at night and unlawfully possessing a firearm and knife. In May, at the time of disposition, an issue arose as to the characterization of a $1,000 payment D.A.B. was ordered to make. No order resolving that issue was entered until February 2014, by which time D.A.B. had turned nineteen years old. As conceded by the State, the juvenile court’s authority to order restitution ends when the child turns nineteen. J.D. v. State, 849 So.2d 458, 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Accordingly, the order under appeal is quashed.

ORDER QUASHED.

PALMER, COHEN and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

D.A.B. appeals an order directing payment of restitution.¹ In April of 2018, D.A.B. pleaded no contest to charges of taking a deer at night and unlawfully possessing a firearm and knife. In May, at the time of disposition, an issue arose as to the characterization of a $1,000 payment D.A.B. was ordered to make. No order resolving that issue was entered until February 2014, by which time D.A.B. had turned nineteen years old. As conceded by the State, the juvenile court’s authority to order restitution ends when the child turns nineteen. J.D. v. State, 849 So.2d 458, 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Accordingly, the order under appeal is quashed.

ORDER QUASHED.

PALMER, COHEN and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 So. 3d 582, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1192, 2015 WL 376431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dab-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack