D.A. v. State

636 So. 2d 863, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4513, 1994 WL 176713
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 10, 1994·No. No. 93-2437·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks reversal of an adjudication of delinquency based on the State’s failure to present evidence that the arresting officer was performing a legal duty under a valid pickup order.

The legality of an arrest is an essential element of the charge of resisting arrest without violence under section 843.02, Florida Statutes (1993). Lee v. State, 368 So.2d 395 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) cert. denied, 378 So.2d 349 (Fla.1979). The officers’ testimony that the appellant was arrested under a valid pickup order, without the order itself introduced into evidence, was not competent proof that the order was indeed legally valid. See Smith v. State, 546 So.2d 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

Based on the record and the State’s concession, we reverse the appellant’s adjudication of delinquency.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D.A. v. State, 636 So. 2d 863, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4513, 1994 WL 176713 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

636 So. 2d 863 (D.A. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

J.C. v. State
205 So. 3d 830 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
DW v. State
40 So. 3d 782 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
B.D.H. v. State
903 So. 2d 390 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
S.P. v. State
833 So. 2d 267 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)