D.A. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

D.A. v. State

636 So. 2d 863, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4513, 1994 WL 176713

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 10, 1994

DocketNo. 93-2437

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 636 So. 2d 863 (D.A. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

D.A. v. State, 636 So. 2d 863, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4513, 1994 WL 176713 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks reversal of an adjudication of delinquency based on the State’s failure to present evidence that the arresting officer was performing a legal duty under a valid pickup order.

The legality of an arrest is an essential element of the charge of resisting arrest without violence under section 843.02, Florida Statutes (1993). Lee v. State, 368 So.2d 395 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) cert. denied, 378 So.2d 349 (Fla.1979). The officers’ testimony that the appellant was arrested under a valid pickup order, without the order itself introduced into evidence, was not competent proof that the order was indeed legally valid. See Smith v. State, 546 So.2d 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

Based on the record and the State’s concession, we reverse the appellant’s adjudication of delinquency.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks reversal of an adjudication of delinquency based on the State’s failure to present evidence that the arresting officer was performing a legal duty under a valid pickup order.

The legality of an arrest is an essential element of the charge of resisting arrest without violence under section 843.02, Florida Statutes (1993). Lee v. State, 368 So.2d 395 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) cert. denied, 378 So.2d 349 (Fla.1979). The officers’ testimony that the appellant was arrested under a valid pickup order, without the order itself introduced into evidence, was not competent proof that the order was indeed legally valid. See Smith v. State, 546 So.2d 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

Based on the record and the State’s concession, we reverse the appellant’s adjudication of delinquency.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

636 So. 2d 863, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4513, 1994 WL 176713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/da-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack