Da Rin v. Cardone
This text of 28 Misc. 2d 511 (Da Rin v. Cardone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No adequate excuse for failure to move to restore the case within the one-year period provided in subdivision (c) of rule XV of the Rules of the City Court of the City of New York was given. Therefore no discretion existed to grant the relief.
[512]*512The. order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
Concur — Hecht, J. P., Steuer and Tilzeb, JJ.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 Misc. 2d 511, 219 N.Y.S.2d 650, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/da-rin-v-cardone-nyappterm-1960.