D.A., A JUVENILE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of D.A., A JUVENILE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (D.A., A JUVENILE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May 31, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D22-0521 Lower Tribunal No. 21-825 ________________
D.A., A Juvenile, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Scott M. Bernstein, Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender and Shannon Hemmendinger, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General and Christina L. Dominguez and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
Before SCALES, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Ramirez v. State, 739 So. 2d 568, 575–76 (Fla. 1999)
(establishing five-factor test for determining voluntariness of Miranda
waiver); Neely v. State, 126 So. 3d 342, 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (“The
voluntariness of a juvenile’s confession is determined by an examination of
the totality of the circumstances surrounding the confession.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
D.A., A JUVENILE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/da-a-juvenile-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2023.