D.A., A JUVENILE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 2023·No. 22-0521·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed May 31, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D22-0521

Lower Tribunal No. 21-825

D.A., A Juvenile,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Scott M.

Bernstein, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender and Shannon Hemmendinger, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General and Christina L. Dominguez and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Ramirez v. State, 739 So. 2d 568, 575–76 (Fla. 1999)

(establishing five-factor test for determining voluntariness of Miranda waiver); Neely v. State, 126 So. 3d 342, 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (“The voluntariness of a juvenile’s confession is determined by an examination of the totality of the circumstances surrounding the confession.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D.A., A JUVENILE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2023).

D.A., A JUVENILE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (D.A., A JUVENILE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ramirez v. State
739 So. 2d 568 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Neely v. State
126 So. 3d 342 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)