D. T. Solomon v. Southern Pacific Company
This text of 439 F.2d 696 (D. T. Solomon v. Southern Pacific Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
439 F.2d 696
D. T. SOLOMON, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY, Defendant-Cross
Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross Appellee, Phillips Petroleum
Company, Phillips Products, Inc., and Coastal Resin Company,
Defendants-Cross Defendants-Appellees-Cross Appellants.
No. 30225.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 17, 1971.
Larry F. York, Houston, Tex., for Southern Pacific Co.; Baker, Botts, Shepherd & Coates, Houston, Tex., of counsel.
E. H. Brown, Eugene C. Marshall, Houston, Tex., for Phillips Petroleum Co. and others; Wm. J. Zeman, Lloyd G. Minter, Bartlesville, Okl., of counsel.
Robert J. Foreman, Dallas, Tex., for D. T. Solomon.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; John V. Singleton, Jr., District Judge.
Before GEWIN, BELL and ALDISERT,* Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1
Of the Third Circuit, sitting by designation
See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
439 F.2d 696, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/d-t-solomon-v-southern-pacific-company-ca5-1971.