D. T. Solomon v. Southern Pacific Company

439 F.2d 696, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11308
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 17, 1971·No. 30225·Published

Opinion

439 F.2d 696

D. T. SOLOMON, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY, Defendant-Cross
Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross Appellee, Phillips Petroleum
Company, Phillips Products, Inc., and Coastal Resin Company,
Defendants-Cross Defendants-Appellees-Cross Appellants.

No. 30225.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 17, 1971.

Larry F. York, Houston, Tex., for Southern Pacific Co.; Baker, Botts, Shepherd & Coates, Houston, Tex., of counsel.

E. H. Brown, Eugene C. Marshall, Houston, Tex., for Phillips Petroleum Co. and others; Wm. J. Zeman, Lloyd G. Minter, Bartlesville, Okl., of counsel.

Robert J. Foreman, Dallas, Tex., for D. T. Solomon.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; John V. Singleton, Jr., District Judge.

Before GEWIN, BELL and ALDISERT,* Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1

*

Of the Third Circuit, sitting by designation

1

See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D. T. Solomon v. Southern Pacific Company, 439 F.2d 696, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11308 (5th Cir. 1971).

439 F.2d 696 (D. T. Solomon v. Southern Pacific Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related