D. Patrick Smitherman v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 19, 2013·No. 01-13-00635-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: D. Patrick Smitherman v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

Appellate case number: 01-13-00635-CV

Trial court case number: 2010-10256

Trial court: 129th District Court of Harris County

On December 12, 2013, appellee filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal. The motion requests dismissal, or, in the alternative, an order for appellant to pay for the complete reporter’s record to be filed in this appeal. The motion to dismiss is DENIED. Appellant, however, is ordered to make arrangements to pay for the remainder of the reporter’s record requested by appellee within 30 days of the date of this order. TEX. R. CIV. P. 34.5(c)(3). The court reporter is ordered to file the additional portions of the record within 60 days of the date of this order, or notify this Court if payment arrangements have not been made within 30 days of the date of this order. Appellee’s brief will be due 30 days after the date the additional reporter’s record is filed with the Court. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Rebeca Huddle  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: December 19, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D. Patrick Smitherman v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

D. Patrick Smitherman v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline (D. Patrick Smitherman v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.