D. P. Harris Hdw. & Mfg. Co. v. United States
38 Cust. Ct. 540
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJune 13, 1957
DocketNo. 60866; protest 213779-K (New York)
StatusPublished
This text of 38 Cust. Ct. 540 (D. P. Harris Hdw. & Mfg. Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
D. P. Harris Hdw. & Mfg. Co. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 540 (cusc 1957).
Opinion
[541]*541Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the prop cycle stands in question are not necessary or essential to the efficient operation of a bicycle and that said prop cycle stands are bicycle accessories, wholly or in chief value of base metal, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
38 Cust. Ct. 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/d-p-harris-hdw-mfg-co-v-united-states-cusc-1957.