D. M. Osborne & Co. v. Gray
19 N.W. 81, 32 Minn. 53, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 80
Opinion
Where, in a bill of costs offered for adjustment, are items for witnesses who, for any cause, were not sworn, if the items are objected to, an affidavit showing the attendance and travel of the witnesses, and stating that they were “necessary and material,” is not sufficient. There must be an affidavit stating facts which show the necessity of having them in attendance, which affidavit the party may furnish when the items are objected to.
Judgment affirmed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
D. M. Osborne & Co. v. Gray, 19 N.W. 81, 32 Minn. 53, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 80 (Mich. 1884).
19 N.W. 81 (D. M. Osborne & Co. v. Gray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Merchants' State Bank v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.
104 N.W. 713 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1905)
Berryhill v. Carney
79 N.W. 170 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1899)
Simpkins v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.
61 F. 999 (W.D. Missouri, 1894)
Merriman v. Bowen
28 N.W. 921 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1886)