D. M. C. Construction Corp. v. A. Leo Nash Steel Corp.

50 A.D.2d 560, 375 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12307
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 3, 1975·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

— In a proceeding to stay arbitration of a contract dispute, in which respondent cross-moved to compel arbitration, petitioner appeals from portions of two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, both dated June 16, 1975, as follows: (1) from so much of the first order as (a) dismissed the petition and (b) granted the cross motion and (2) from so much of the second order as, upon reargument, adhered to the original decision. Appeal from the original order dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the order which granted reargument. Order on reargument affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements. Respondent commenced an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien and later joined, as a party defendant, the bonding company which had furnished a bond to discharge the lien. The commencement and maintenance of that action did not constitute a waiver of its right to arbitration (see Lien Law, § 35; May r New Amsterdam Cas. Co., 270 App Div 472; A. Burgart, Inc. v Foster-Lipkins Corp., 63 Misc 2d 930, affd 38 AD2d 779, affd [561] 30 NY2d 901). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Munder and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D. M. C. Construction Corp. v. A. Leo Nash Steel Corp., 50 A.D.2d 560, 375 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12307 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

50 A.D.2d 560 (D. M. C. Construction Corp. v. A. Leo Nash Steel Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tradesource, Inc. v. Ancor, Inc.
281 A.D.2d 538 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
D. M. C. Construction Corp. v. A. Leo Nash Steel Corp.
51 A.D.2d 1040 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)