D. Loveman & Son Export Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, D. Loveman & Son, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of 296 F.2d 732 (D. Loveman & Son Export Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, D. Loveman & Son, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
296 F.2d 732
62-1 USTC P 9147
D. LOVEMAN & SON EXPORT CORP., Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
D. LOVEMAN & SON, INC., Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Nos. 14543, 14544.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 16, 1961.
On Petitions for Review of the Decisions of the Tax Court of the United States.
Richard Katcher, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioners.
Richard J. Heiman, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson and A. F. Prescott, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., on brief, for respondent.
Before MARTIN, WEICK and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.
The above causes came on to be heard upon the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and upon due consideration thereof, it is the opinion of this Court tha the decision of the Tax Court should be affirmed. The opinion of the Tax Court adequately reviews the factual background of the litigation and we agree with the conclusions of the Tax Court as expressed in the able opinion of Judge Arnold Raum, which is reported as 34 T.C. 776 (1960).
It is, therefore, ordered that the decision of the Tax Court be, and the same is, hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
296 F.2d 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/d-loveman-son-export-corp-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-d-ca6-1961.