D. K. Johnson v. Vickie Breitenstein and John Joseph Breitenstein
This text of D. K. Johnson v. Vickie Breitenstein and John Joseph Breitenstein (D. K. Johnson v. Vickie Breitenstein and John Joseph Breitenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D17-1740 _____________________________
D. K. JOHNSON,
Appellant,
v.
VICKIE BREITENSTEIN and JOHN JOSEPH BREITENSTEIN,
Appellees. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Karen Cole, Judge.
April 30, 2018
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Caldwell v. Fla. Dep’t of Elder Affairs, 121 So. 3d 1062, 1064 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (“‘Claims for which an appellant has not presented an argument, or for which he provides only conclusory argument, are insufficiently presented for review and are waived.’”) (quoting Hammond v. State, 34 So. 3d 58, 59 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)).
ROWE, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
D.K. Johnson, pro se, Appellant.
Vickie Breitenstein and John Joseph Breitenstein, pro se, Appellees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
D. K. Johnson v. Vickie Breitenstein and John Joseph Breitenstein, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/d-k-johnson-v-vickie-breitenstein-and-john-joseph-breitenstein-fladistctapp-2018.