D. K. Johnson v. Vickie Breitenstein and John Joseph Breitenstein

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 30, 2018·No. 17-1740·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D17-1740 _____________________________

D. K. JOHNSON,

Appellant,

v.

VICKIE BREITENSTEIN and JOHN JOSEPH BREITENSTEIN,

Appellees. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Karen Cole, Judge.

April 30, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Caldwell v. Fla. Dep’t of Elder Affairs, 121 So. 3d 1062, 1064 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (“‘Claims for which an appellant has not presented an argument, or for which he provides only conclusory argument, are insufficiently presented for review and are waived.’”) (quoting Hammond v. State, 34 So. 3d 58, 59 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)).

ROWE, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

D.K. Johnson, pro se, Appellant.

Vickie Breitenstein and John Joseph Breitenstein, pro se, Appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D. K. Johnson v. Vickie Breitenstein and John Joseph Breitenstein, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

D. K. Johnson v. Vickie Breitenstein and John Joseph Breitenstein (D. K. Johnson v. Vickie Breitenstein and John Joseph Breitenstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hammond v. State
34 So. 3d 58 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Caldwell v. Florida Department of Elder Affairs
121 So. 3d 1062 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)