D. J. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

D. J. v. State

355 So. 2d 199, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15316

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 1978·No. No. 77-650·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order adjudicating D. J., a juvenile, delinquent on a charge of petit larceny, and placing him under the supervision of the Florida Division of Youth Services. The sole point on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence. [200] After a careful review of the record in the light of the argument and briefs of counsel, we find that there was competent substantial evidence to support the trial judge’s conclusions, and to support the adjudication of delinquency. Crum v. State, 172 So.2d 24 (Fla.3d DCA 1965); Starling v. State, 263 So.2d 645 (Fla.3d DCA 1972); H. D. v. State, 348 So.2d 1159 (Fla.3d DCA 1976).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order adjudicating D. J., a juvenile, delinquent on a charge of petit larceny, and placing him under the supervision of the Florida Division of Youth Services. The sole point on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence. [200] After a careful review of the record in the light of the argument and briefs of counsel, we find that there was competent substantial evidence to support the trial judge’s conclusions, and to support the adjudication of delinquency. Crum v. State, 172 So.2d 24 (Fla.3d DCA 1965); Starling v. State, 263 So.2d 645 (Fla.3d DCA 1972); H. D. v. State, 348 So.2d 1159 (Fla.3d DCA 1976).

Affirmed.

D. J. v. State, 355 So. 2d 199, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15316 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

355 So. 2d 199 (D. J. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related