D. J. Faour & Bros. v. Moran

1914 OK 10, 139 P. 833, 40 Okla. 597, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 102
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 13, 1914
Docket2987
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 1914 OK 10 (D. J. Faour & Bros. v. Moran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D. J. Faour & Bros. v. Moran, 1914 OK 10, 139 P. 833, 40 Okla. 597, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 102 (Okla. 1914).

Opinion

WILLIAMS, J.

The defendants in error, Eid Moran and N. Moran, as plaintiffs, sued the plaintiffs in error, as defend *598 ants, to recover the sum of $1,510 as damages, to wit, $1,010 .as a'ctual, and $500 as punitive. A trial was had without a jury, :and a general finding made in favor of the plaintiffs in the ■sum of $938.40; said finding being for actual damages, and nothing allowed for punitive damages. This proceeding in error is •to review said action of the trial court.

This court has repeatedly held that a general finding in favor of one of the parties will, upon review here, be given the same weight as the verdict of a jury.

Where the evidence was partly in parol and partly in writing, and conflicting, and the finding of- the court is general, such •finding is a finding of every special thing essential to sustain the general' finding, and is conclusive upon this court upon all doubtful and disputed questions of fact. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co. v. Lyons & Co., ante, p. 356, 138 Pac. 167, and authorities therein cited.

The questions presented for the consideration of this court by the brief of the plaintiff in error are concluded by this principle of law.

It follows that the judgment of the" lower court must be affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robison v. Thompson
1924 OK 877 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
Schaff v. McGuyre
1922 OK 185 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1922)
Barnett v. Barnett
1920 OK 194 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)
McKenna v. J. S. Terry Const. Co.
1916 OK 279 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Anderson v. Rose
1915 OK 740 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
Akin v. Bonfils
1915 OK 398 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1914 OK 10, 139 P. 833, 40 Okla. 597, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/d-j-faour-bros-v-moran-okla-1914.