D & E Investments, L.L.C. v. Singleton

6 So. 3d 528, 2008 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 573, 2008 WL 4182507
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in D & E Investments, L.L.C. v. Singleton. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 565
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided September 12, 2008·No. 2051014·Published

Opinion

*529 BRYAN, Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte Singleton, 6 So.3d 515 (Ala.2008). The sole issue raised on appeal by D & E Investments, L.L.C., d/b/a Kiva Dunes (“Kiva Dunes”), was whether Thomas W. Singleton provided proper notice of his workplace accident to Kiva Dunes. In our prior judgment, this court reversed the trial court’s judgment finding that Singleton had provided proper notice to Kiva Dunes. D & E Invs., L.L.C. v. Singleton, 6 So.3d 506 (Ala.Civ.App.2007). Because the supreme court has concluded that the trial court did not err in finding that proper notice had been given to Kiva Dunes, and because the issue of notice was the only issue raised on appeal, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, P.J., and PITTMAN, THOMAS, and MOORE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D & E Investments, L.L.C. v. Singleton, 6 So. 3d 528, 2008 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 573, 2008 WL 4182507 (Ala. Ct. App. 2008).

6 So. 3d 528 (D & E Investments, L.L.C. v. Singleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

D & E Investments, L.L.C. v. Singleton
6 So. 3d 506 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2007)