D. E. Foote & Co. v. Harrington
246 U.S. 657, 38 S. Ct. 425, 62 L. Ed. 925, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1613
This text of 246 U.S. 657 (D. E. Foote & Co. v. Harrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
D. E. Foote & Co. v. Harrington, 246 U.S. 657, 38 S. Ct. 425, 62 L. Ed. 925, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1613 (1918).
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Holden Land Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541; Bilby v. Stewart, ante, 255.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Eustis v. Bolles
150 U.S. 361 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Leathe v. Thomas
207 U.S. 93 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Holden Land & Live Stock Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co.
233 U.S. 536 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
246 U.S. 657, 38 S. Ct. 425, 62 L. Ed. 925, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/d-e-foote-co-v-harrington-scotus-1918.