D. E. Foote & Co. v. Harrington
246 U.S. 657, 38 S. Ct. 425, 62 L. Ed. 925, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1613
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Holden Land Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541; Bilby v. Stewart, ante, 255.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
D. E. Foote & Co. v. Harrington, 246 U.S. 657, 38 S. Ct. 425, 62 L. Ed. 925, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1613 (1918).
246 U.S. 657 (D. E. Foote & Co. v. Harrington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eustis v. Bolles
150 U.S. 361 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Leathe v. Thomas
207 U.S. 93 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Holden Land & Live Stock Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co.
233 U.S. 536 (Supreme Court, 1914)