D. D. v. Lausd

Ninth Circuit

D. D. v. Lausd

995 F.3d 670

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 6, 2021

Docket19-55810

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 995 F.3d 670 (D. D. v. Lausd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

D. D. v. Lausd, 995 F.3d 670 (9th Cir. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 6 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

D. D., a minor, by and through his Guardian No. 19-55810 Ad Litem, Michaela Ingram, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 2:19-cv-00399-PA-PLA Central District of California, v. Los Angeles

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL ORDER DISTRICT,

Defendant-Appellee.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI