D. D. S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

D. D. S. v. State

392 So. 2d 328, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 27972

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 6, 1981

DocketNo. 78-693

StatusPublished

This text of 392 So. 2d 328 (D. D. S. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

D. D. S. v. State, 392 So. 2d 328, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 27972 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s adjudication of delinquency is reversed on a finding that the circumstantial evidence relied upon by the state was not shown to be inconsistent with a reasonable hypothesis of innocence. Circumstantial evidence did not rise to that reasonable certainty that the accused committed the offense. Pate v. State, 72 Fla. 97, 72 So. 517 (1916); see also, 13 Fla.Jur. Evidence § 417 and cases cited therein.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s adjudication of delinquency is reversed on a finding that the circumstantial evidence relied upon by the state was not shown to be inconsistent with a reasonable hypothesis of innocence. Circumstantial evidence did not rise to that reasonable certainty that the accused committed the offense. Pate v. State, 72 Fla. 97, 72 So. 517 (1916); see also, 13 Fla.Jur. Evidence § 417 and cases cited therein.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

392 So. 2d 328, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 27972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/d-d-s-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack