D & D Recreation, Inc. v. Royal Globe Insurance

54 A.D.2d 889, 388 N.Y.S.2d 14, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14707
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 1, 1976·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action on a fire insurance policy issued by defendant covering a nursery school operated by plaintiff, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated April 21, 1976, which denied its motion to strike specified items from plaintiff’s demand for a bill of particulars. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted. The purpose of a bill of particulars is to amplify the pleadings, limit the proof and prevent surprise at the trial but not to provide evidentiary material (Cirelli v Victory Mem. Hosp., 45 AD2d 856; Belott v State of New York, 40 AD2d 729; State of New York v Horsemen’s Benevolent & Protective Assn. [N. Y. Div.], 34 AD2d 769). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Damiani, Rabin, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D & D Recreation, Inc. v. Royal Globe Insurance, 54 A.D.2d 889, 388 N.Y.S.2d 14, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14707 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

54 A.D.2d 889 (D & D Recreation, Inc. v. Royal Globe Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Exact Value, Inc. v. Chemical Bank
83 A.D.2d 821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)