D. C. Transit System, Inc. v. Guy W. Pearson, Collector of Taxes, District of Columbia, and James L. Martin, Tax Assessor, District of Columbia
This text of 250 F.2d 765 (D. C. Transit System, Inc. v. Guy W. Pearson, Collector of Taxes, District of Columbia, and James L. Martin, Tax Assessor, District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and was argued by counsel.
On consideration whereof, and the Court being of opinion that the plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law by payment of the tax, claim for refund, and either appeal to the District of Columbia Tax Court or civil action in the District Court, and counsel for the District of Columbia having given assurance of agreement to the foregoing view, and it thus appearing that suit for injunction will not lie (D.C.Code, § 47-2410 (1951)), it is
Ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the said District Court appealed from in this cause be, and it is hereby, reversed, and that the case be, and it is hereby, remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss; and it is
Further ordered by the Court that appellant herein recover from appellees its taxable costs on this appeal and have execution therefor.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 F.2d 765, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/d-c-transit-system-inc-v-guy-w-pearson-collector-of-taxes-district-cadc-1957.