D. C. Roddy & Co. v. Elam

47 S.C.L. 343
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedMay 15, 1866
StatusPublished

This text of 47 S.C.L. 343 (D. C. Roddy & Co. v. Elam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D. C. Roddy & Co. v. Elam, 47 S.C.L. 343 (S.C. Ct. App. 1866).

Opinion

Curia, per

Dunkin, C. J.

Upon the matters discussed in the decree this Court concur with the Chancellor. As to the third ground of appeal, it is only necessary to say that A. T. Black was merely a formal party as holding the legal title, and the discretion of the Chancellor was properly exercised.

The appeal is dismissed.

Wardlaw and Inglis, J. J., concurred.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 S.C.L. 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/d-c-roddy-co-v-elam-scctapp-1866.