D. C Individually and A/N/F M.M. v. Darius McClinton-Hunter

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 27, 2015
Docket05-13-01253-CV
StatusPublished

This text of D. C Individually and A/N/F M.M. v. Darius McClinton-Hunter (D. C Individually and A/N/F M.M. v. Darius McClinton-Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D. C Individually and A/N/F M.M. v. Darius McClinton-Hunter, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Order entered April 27, 2015

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01253-CV

D. C. INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF THE MINOR M.M., G.T. INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF THE MINOR O.T., L.T. INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF THE MINOR O.T., J.C. INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF THE MINOR A.C., AND S.C. J.C. INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF THE MINOR A.C., Appellants V. DARIUS MCCLINTON-HUNTER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199-01692-2013

ORDER This appeal was submitted on October 28, 2014. On January 7, 2015, appellee’s counsel

filed a letter with the Court stating the parties settled the matter. By later dated January 8, 2015,

we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed on January 30, 2015, absent further

communication from the parties concerning the status of the appeal. Appellants’ counsel

responded that no settlement agreement had yet been reached. On March 2, 2015, we ordered

the parties to file a joint status report.

On March 18, 2015, the parties filed a letter advising the Court that they had negotiated a

settlement disposing of all claims and issues in this appeal, and only needed to execute

settlement documents. The parties stated they would dismiss the appeal after thirty days during

which final settlement documents would be approved and signed. More than thirty days have now passed, and the Court has received neither a motion to dismiss the appeal nor any other

communications regarding the status of the settlement.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties to file, by MAY 8, 2015, either an agreed

motion to dismiss the appeal or a letter notifying the Court the case will not settle and the appeal

should proceed. No further extensions will be granted. If the Court does not receive either the

motion to dismiss or notification of non-settlement by the date specified, the Court will, without

further notice, take any action it deems appropriate, including dismissal of the appeal. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

/Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE PRESIDING JUSTICE

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
D. C Individually and A/N/F M.M. v. Darius McClinton-Hunter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/d-c-individually-and-anf-mm-v-darius-mcclinton-hunter-texapp-2015.