D. C. Heath & Co. v. Marrs

273 S.W. 794, 114 Tex. 574, 1925 Tex. LEXIS 117
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJune 10, 1925
DocketNo. 4385.
StatusPublished

This text of 273 S.W. 794 (D. C. Heath & Co. v. Marrs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D. C. Heath & Co. v. Marrs, 273 S.W. 794, 114 Tex. 574, 1925 Tex. LEXIS 117 (Tex. 1925).

Opinion

MR. JUSTICE PIERSON,

delivered .the opinion of the court. Relator seeks a mandamus against respondent to require him to do and perform the ministerial or statutory duties which it has a legal right to have performed in regard to its contract with the State of Texas for the purchase of certain textbooks, to-wit: “Webster’s Early European History” and “Webster’s Modern European History.” The facts and the issues in this case are, in all material respects, the same as in the case of Laidlaw Brothers, Incorporated, v. S. M. N. Marrs, State Superintendent, opinion delivered June 8, 1925, (114 Texas, 561) and were given careful attention in the consideration of that case. For the reasons stated in that case, the writ of mandamus is awarded herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Laidlaw Bros. v. Marrs
273 S.W. 789 (Texas Supreme Court, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
273 S.W. 794, 114 Tex. 574, 1925 Tex. LEXIS 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/d-c-heath-co-v-marrs-tex-1925.