D. C. Andrews International, Inc. v. United States

Customs and Patent Appeals

D. C. Andrews International, Inc. v. United States

485 F.2d 1401, 61 C.C.P.A. 1, 1973 CCPA LEXIS 250

CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals

DecidedOctober 25, 1973

DocketNo. 5520, C.A.D. 1107

StatusPublished

This text of 485 F.2d 1401 (D. C. Andrews International, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

D. C. Andrews International, Inc. v. United States, 485 F.2d 1401, 61 C.C.P.A. 1, 1973 CCPA LEXIS 250 (ccpa 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

This appeal is from tbe order and judgment of the United States Customs Court, D. C. Andrews International, Inc. v. United States, Reappraisement Nos. R67/18607, etc., entered July 21,1972, denying appellant’s motion for vacation of an order entered May 26, 1972, dismissing the instant five actions for lack of prosecution, for a rehearing as to the dismissal, and for permission to file a Motion to Consolidate the appeals in the instant actions with a different reappraisement appeal.

We have considered the order and the effect of the order upon appellant, and agree with the Customs Court that the dismissal of the actions for lack of prosecution was properly granted.

The order of the Customs Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

This appeal is from tbe order and judgment of the United States Customs Court, D. C. Andrews International, Inc. v. United States, Reappraisement Nos. R67/18607, etc., entered July 21,1972, denying appellant’s motion for vacation of an order entered May 26, 1972, dismissing the instant five actions for lack of prosecution, for a rehearing as to the dismissal, and for permission to file a Motion to Consolidate the appeals in the instant actions with a different reappraisement appeal.

We have considered the order and the effect of the order upon appellant, and agree with the Customs Court that the dismissal of the actions for lack of prosecution was properly granted.

The order of the Customs Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

485 F.2d 1401, 61 C.C.P.A. 1, 1973 CCPA LEXIS 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/d-c-andrews-international-inc-v-united-states-ccpa-1973.