D. C. Andrews & Co. v. United States
40 Cust. Ct. 474
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in D. C. Andrews & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 Cust. Ct. 227 →
United States Customs Court·Decided March 6, 1958·No. No. 61630; protest 298207-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
[475]*475Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of photo enlargers; that said enlargers were held dutiable at 15 percent under paragraph 1551, as modified, as photographic cameras in Manca, Inc. v. United States (38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874); and that, in accord? anee with said decision, parts for enlargers are properly dutiable as parts of photographic cameras under paragraph 1551, the claim of the plaintiff at 20 percent was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
D. C. Andrews & Co. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 474 (cusc 1958).
40 Cust. Ct. 474 (D. C. Andrews & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Manca, Inc. v. United States
38 Cust. Ct. 271 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)