D. B. Dunlevy & Co. v. Schartz
17 Ohio St. (N.S.) 640
Opinion
An affidavit stating the plaintiff’s belief that defendant had absconded with intent to defraud his creditors, without setting forth any facts justifying such belief, does not lay a sufficient, ground for issuing a writ of attachment.
Motion overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
D. B. Dunlevy & Co. v. Schartz, 17 Ohio St. (N.S.) 640 (Ohio 1867).
17 Ohio St. (N.S.) 640 (D. B. Dunlevy & Co. v. Schartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.