Czyzowski v. Gregelewicz

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Czyzowski v. Gregelewicz

1 R.I. Dec. 141

Superior Court of Rhode Island·Decided March 30, 1925·No. No.51217; No.51218·Published

Opinion

BLODGETT, J.

Heard upon motions for new trial filed by defendant in each case after verdict for plaintiffs in each caste for $250.

Actions for slander of defendant' upon a public street of Providence by the calling' of a plaintiff Bessie a “whore” and her husband, Albert, a “thief” in the presence of a number of bystanders. The words were spoken in the Polish language.

For Plaintiffs: William A. Mc-Soley. For Defendant: William C. H. Brand.

Defendant denied using such language, but the jury evidently believed the testimony of plaintiffs and witnesses produced by them.

Motions denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLODGETT, J.

Heard upon motions for new trial filed by defendant in each case after verdict for plaintiffs in each caste for $250.

Actions for slander of defendant' upon a public street of Providence by the calling' of a plaintiff Bessie a “whore” and her husband, Albert, a “thief” in the presence of a number of bystanders. The words were spoken in the Polish language.

For Plaintiffs: William A. Mc-Soley. For Defendant: William C. H. Brand.

Defendant denied using such language, but the jury evidently believed the testimony of plaintiffs and witnesses produced by them.

Motions denied.

Czyzowski v. Gregelewicz, 1 R.I. Dec. 141 (R.I. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

1 R.I. Dec. 141 (Czyzowski v. Gregelewicz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.