Czarnikow, MacDougall & Co. v. Bidwell

Supreme Court

Czarnikow, MacDougall & Co. v. Bidwell

191 U.S. 559, 24 S. Ct. 847

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedDecember 14, 1903

DocketNo. 14

StatusPublished

This text of 191 U.S. 559 (Czarnikow, MacDougall & Co. v. Bidwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Czarnikow, MacDougall & Co. v. Bidwell, 191 U.S. 559, 24 S. Ct. 847 (1903).

Pincite

Opinion

In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs, on the authority of Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U. S. 244, 287.

(The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr, Justice [560]*560Brewer and Mr. Justice Peckham dissent.) Mr. Frederic B. Coudert, Jr., Mr. Paul Puller and Mr. Henry M. Ward for plaintiff in error. The Attorney General and Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs, on the authority of Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U. S. 244, 287.

(The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr, Justice [560]*560Brewer and Mr. Justice Peckham dissent.) Mr. Frederic B. Coudert, Jr., Mr. Paul Puller and Mr. Henry M. Ward for plaintiff in error. The Attorney General and Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt for defendant in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 U.S. 559, 24 S. Ct. 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/czarnikow-macdougall-co-v-bidwell-scotus-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack