Czarniecki v. Jesse C. Stewart Co.
Opinion
According to appellee’s testimony, appellant’s truck was traveling on the left side of the road, without lights. As it neared appellee’s approaching automobile, proceeding in the opposite direction, the truck swerved to the proper side of the road. The rear of the truck struck the front of appellee’s car obliquely.
*164 Appellant contends that the doctrine of incontrovertible physical facts refutes appellee’s story of the accident, the reason being that a collision between two vehicles proceeding in opposite directions would cause them, not to wedge together, with appellee’s car being pulled completely around, as was here alleged, but to recoil. Obviously this is simply an ordinary factual question relating to the manner of the particular accident which the jury must decide. The accident could have occurred as appellee relates, and it is therefore a jury question. The doctrine of incontrovertible physical facts has no application here.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
200 A. 84 (Czarniecki v. Jesse C. Stewart Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.