Czarnecki v. Mendoza

79 A.D.2d 604, 433 N.Y.S.2d 496, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13945
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 1, 1980·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 5 of the Family Court Act, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, entered November 19, 1979, which awarded petitioner’s counsel a fee of $2,000. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to the Family Court, Nassau County, for a hearing to determine (1) an appropriate counsel fee for petitioner’s attorney and (2) the relative financial circumstances of the parties, so as to permit a proper allocation of any such fee. In view of the conflicting affidavits submitted by the parties with respect to the nature and value of the services performed by petitioner’s attorney, the Family Court should have conducted a hearing before fixing a counsel fee. Fur[605]*605ther, in the interest of doing juistice between the parties, the court should also hear evidence on the question of the proper allocation of any such counsel fee, based upon the relative financial circumstances of the parties (see Yagoda v Yagoda, 73 AD2d 619; Wood v Wood, 73 AD2d 963). Damiani, J. P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Czarnecki v. Mendoza, 79 A.D.2d 604, 433 N.Y.S.2d 496, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13945 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

79 A.D.2d 604 (Czarnecki v. Mendoza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pamela J. D. v. Terence F. D.
118 A.D.2d 853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
MacFadden v. Martini
119 Misc. 2d 94 (NYC Family Court, 1983)