Czapla v. Czapla

Missouri Court of Appeals

Czapla v. Czapla

552 S.W.2d 286, 1977 Mo. App. LEXIS 2108

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 24, 1977·No. No. 38077·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

CLEMENS, Presiding Judge.

Dissolution of marriage. Plaintiff-husband appeals from the trial court’s decree, contending there was no competent and substantial evidence to support the decree divesting him of his undivided interest in the family home and furnishings, and awarding defendant-wife $20 a week for maintenance and $300 for attorney’s fee.

Applying the standards of review declared in Murphy v. Carrón, 536 S.W.2d 30[l-3] (Mo.1976), and finding an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment. Rule 84.16(b).

DOWD and SMITH, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CLEMENS, Presiding Judge.

Dissolution of marriage. Plaintiff-husband appeals from the trial court’s decree, contending there was no competent and substantial evidence to support the decree divesting him of his undivided interest in the family home and furnishings, and awarding defendant-wife $20 a week for maintenance and $300 for attorney’s fee.

Applying the standards of review declared in Murphy v. Carrón, 536 S.W.2d 30[l-3] (Mo.1976), and finding an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment. Rule 84.16(b).

DOWD and SMITH, JJ, concur.

Czapla v. Czapla, 552 S.W.2d 286, 1977 Mo. App. LEXIS 2108 (Mo. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

552 S.W.2d 286 (Czapla v. Czapla) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related