Czajkowski v. Duggal
251 A.D.2d 616, 675 N.Y.S.2d 875, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7907
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Karam V. Duggal and Neena Duggal appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), dated July 8,1997, which granted the plaintiffs’ ex parte motion to amend the caption of the action.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
No appeal lies from an order issued ex parte (see, Violante v Berkowitz, 90 AD2d 837). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Czajkowski v. Duggal, 251 A.D.2d 616, 675 N.Y.S.2d 875, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).
251 A.D.2d 616 (Czajkowski v. Duggal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Violante v. Berkowitz
90 A.D.2d 837 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)