Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Czajkowski v. Duggal

Czajkowski v. Duggal

251 A.D.2d 616, 675 N.Y.S.2d 875, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7907
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 29, 1998
StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D.2d 616 (Czajkowski v. Duggal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Czajkowski v. Duggal, 251 A.D.2d 616, 675 N.Y.S.2d 875, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Karam V. Duggal and Neena Duggal appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), dated July 8,1997, which granted the plaintiffs’ ex parte motion to amend the caption of the action.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

No appeal lies from an order issued ex parte (see, Violante v Berkowitz, 90 AD2d 837). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Violante v. Berkowitz
90 A.D.2d 837 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.D.2d 616, 675 N.Y.S.2d 875, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/czajkowski-v-duggal-nyappdiv-1998.