Czachorowski v. Weintraub

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Czachorowski v. Weintraub

32 A.D.2d 537, 300 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4234

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 537 (Czachorowski v. Weintraub) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Czachorowski v. Weintraub, 32 A.D.2d 537, 300 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4234 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal and property injuries, etc., plaintiff Judith Czaohorowski (changed to Griffiths) appeals from a judgment of the ¡Supreme -Court, Suffolk County, entered July 16, 1968, which dismissed the complaint upon the decision of the court at the close of plaintiff’s ease upon a jury trial. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted as to appellant, with costs to abide the event. No questions of fact were considered. In our opinion, whether' appellant was contributorily negligent raised an issue for the jury’s determination and, therefore, her complaint should not have been -dismissed at the close of her case. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal and property injuries, etc., plaintiff Judith Czaohorowski (changed to Griffiths) appeals from a judgment of the ¡Supreme -Court, Suffolk County, entered July 16, 1968, which dismissed the complaint upon the decision of the court at the close of plaintiff’s ease upon a jury trial. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted as to appellant, with costs to abide the event. No questions of fact were considered. In our opinion, whether' appellant was contributorily negligent raised an issue for the jury’s determination and, therefore, her complaint should not have been -dismissed at the close of her case. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 537, 300 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/czachorowski-v-weintraub-nyappdiv-1969.